Editorial Policy

Principles

Three rules keep the pages honest. One, every claim about a bonus, a licence or a payment lane is sourced from the operator's own documentation and dated inside the page. Two, promotions that have ended are rewritten or archived, never silently kept live. Three, the affiliate link does not change what we say about the brand — the disclosure page explains the economics so you can judge for yourself.

A fourth rule follows from the first three: no borrowed copy. Every page on the site is written in-house against the source documents; we do not syndicate press releases, we do not run guest posts and we do not accept pre-written content from affiliate networks. This matters because syndicated copy tends to carry the terms the operator wrote for themselves, and those are rarely the terms a player actually encounters.

Complaints About Content

If a passage looks wrong, email the editorial inbox with the URL and the paragraph in dispute. A first reply lands inside three working days, a corrected or withdrawn passage inside 14 days of the original note. Where a correction is substantive, the page footer carries a dated line that records what changed. Minor typos are fixed quietly.

We keep every substantive correction in a public log at the foot of the editorial-policy page: date, URL, what changed, who flagged it. The log is a self-discipline tool as much as a reader-facing feature — a visible correction is harder to repeat. Where a complaint turns out to be unfounded, the page carries no footer note; the complainant receives a short explanation and the matter closes.

Fact Checking

Every number on the site — bonus amount, wagering multiplier, minimum deposit, withdrawal window, game count — ties to a source we can show on request. For operator data the source is the current Mayanreels terms page; for market claims the source is the Gambling Commission or an industry statistic that we cite inline. Nothing on these pages is extrapolated from a competitor.

Fact checks run on a two-pass schedule. The first pass is at writing time against the operator's live terms and the Gambling Commission licence record. The second pass is at the monthly review, where the published page is reread against the same sources to catch silent changes — a wagering multiplier shifted from 30x to 35x, a minimum deposit lifted from 10 GBP to 25 GBP, a payment lane withdrawn from the United Kingdom market. Silent changes are the single most common correction type on a review site, which is why the second pass exists.

Update Cycle

The main review and the bonus hub are checked monthly against the operator's live promotions. The payment page and the responsible-gambling page are reviewed quarterly, or sooner if the Gambling Commission announces a change. The terms, privacy and about pages carry a revision date in the footer so you can see at a glance how recently they were touched.

Where the operator makes an announcement that supersedes the planned cycle — a new welcome bonus, a licence change, a merger — the relevant page is updated inside 72 hours of the announcement and the footer carries a dated note. If a page cannot be verified within that window because the operator has not yet published full terms, the page is marked as under review with a dated banner so you know it is being worked on, rather than quietly left stale.